Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Scientific Report of the European Food Safety Authority on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk (GBR) of Brazil



From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 PM To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Subject: Scientific Report of the European Food Safety Authority on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk (GBR) of Brazil


Scientific Report of the European Food Safety Authority on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk (GBR) of Brazil



doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2005.38r European Food Safety Authority Acknowledgment Members of the EFSA Scientific Expert Working Group on GBR are acknowledged for their valuable contribution to this mandate. The members are: Didier Calavas, Aline De Koeijer, Michael Gravenor, John Griffin, Dagmar Heim, Matthias Kramer, Riitta Maijala, Mo Salman, Vittorio Silano, Emmanuel Vanopdenbosch, and Stig Widell. Type: Scientific Report of EFSA Question number: EFSA-Q-2003-083N Approved: 01 June 2005 Published: 16 August 2005 Last updated: 16 August 2005. This version replaces the previous one/s. Article(0.1 Mb) send print


Abstract No abstract available


Summary The European Food Safety Authority and its Scientific Expert Working Group on the Assessment of the Geographical Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Risk (GBR) were asked by the European Commission (EC) to provide an up-to-date scientific report on the GBR in Brazil, i.e. the likelihood of the presence of one or more cattle being infected with BSE, pre-clinically as well as clinically, in Brazil. This scientific report addresses the GBR of Brazil as assessed in 2005 based on data covering the period 1980-2003.


A very unstable system between 1980 and 2000 was exposed to a negligible external challenge until 1990, to a low external challenge between 1991 and 1995 and to a negligible external challenge between 1996 and 2000. In 2001 the stability of the system improved to an unstable system exposed to a negligible external challenge for the latest period.


Given the level of the external challenge, it is highly unlikely that an internal challenge occurred until 1990. However, the internal challenge became unlikely but cannot be excluded from 1991 onwards, mainly due to cattle imported from BSE-risk countries in 1991-1995.


EFSA concludes that the current GBR level of BRAZIL is II, i.e. it is unlikely but can not be excluded that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSE-agent. If the stability of the system in Brazil remains as low as it is, significant external challenges could lead to an increase in the GBR of the country.


Keywords Scientific Report of the European Food Safety Authority on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk (GBR) of Brazil








Adopted June 2005


Summary


The European Food Safety Authority and its Scientific Expert Working Group on the Assessment of the Geographical Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Risk (GBR) were asked by the European Commission (EC) to provide an up-to-date scientific report on the GBR in Brazil, i.e. the likelihood of the presence of one or more cattle being infected with BSE, pre-clinically as well as clinically, in Brazil. This scientific report addresses the GBR of Brazil as assessed in 2005 based on data covering the period 1980-2003. A very unstable system between 1980 and 2000 was exposed to a negligible external challenge until 1990, to a low external challenge between 1991 and 1995 and to a negligible external challenge between 1996 and 2000. In 2001 the stability of the system improved to an unstable system exposed to a negligible external challenge for the latest period. Given the level of the external challenge, it is highly unlikely that an internal challenge occurred until 1990. However, the internal challenge became unlikely but cannot be excluded from 1991 onwards, mainly due to cattle imported from BSE-risk countries in 1991-1995. EFSA concludes that the current GBR level of BRAZIL is II, i.e. it is unlikely but can not be excluded that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSE-agent. If the stability of the system in Brazil remains as low as it is, significant external challenges could lead to an increase in the GBR of the country.


Key words: BSE, geographical risk assessment, GBR, Brazil, third countries


SNIP...


External Challenge


Brazil was exposed to a negligible external challenge in the period 1980-1990, to a low external challenge in the period 1991-1995 and to a negligible external challenge between 1996 and 2003.


Stability


For the overall assessment of the stability, the impact of the three main stability factors, (i.e. feeding, rendering and SRM-removal) and of the additional stability factor surveillance has to be estimated. Again, the guidance provided by the SSC in its opinion on the GBR of July 2000 (as updated in 2002) is applied. Taking the above-summarized discussion of the most relevant stability factors into account, it is concluded that the BSE/cattle system of Brazil was very unstable between 1980 and 2000 and unstable between 2001 and 2003.


Feeding


Feeding of any Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) to cattle was legal until 1996, when a ruminant- MBM to ruminant feed ban was introduced. However, also after the implementation of this feed ban, contaminated feedstuff could have likely reached cattle due to cross-contamination. Therefore feeding is assessed as “not OK” before and after the 1996 feed-ban (1980-2000). The reinforced mammalian MBM to ruminant feed ban installed in February 2001 improved the stability to “reasonably OK” as from February 2001 onwards.


Rendering


Rendering is considered “not OK” throughout the entire reference period (1980-2003) because the majority of the rendering plants did not meet the 133°C/20min/3bar standard.


SRM-removal


SRM removal is "reasonably OK" throughout the reference period (1980-2003) because the majority of the SRM are consumed by humans and fallen stock are usually buried.


BSE surveillance


BSE-surveillance has been carried out under the auspicious of the rabies surveillance program until January 2001. This surveillance was not adequate to detect low level of clinical BSE incidence. The situation was somewhat improved when the active surveillance system was installed in February 2001.


Conclusions


The European Food Safety Authority concludes:


1. A very unstable system between 1980 and 2000 was exposed to a negligible external challenge until 1990, to a low challenge between 1991 and 1995, to negligible between 1996 and 2000. In 2001 the stability of the system improved to an unstable system exposed to a negligible challenge for the latest period.


2. Given the level of the external challenge, it is highly unlikely that an internal challenge occurred until 1990. However, the internal challenge became unlikely but cannot be excluded from 1991 onwards, mainly due to cattle imported from BSE-risk countries in 1991-1995.


3. The current geographical BSE-risk (GBR) level is II, i.e. it is unlikely but can not be excluded that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSEagent.


4. This assessment deviates from the previous one of April 2003, because some countries were not considered to be at risk for BSE at that time.


5. It is noted that the total imports of live cattle would represent a high challenge if they all entered the cattle/BSE system. The conclusion here however reflects the Brazilian system as described in detail in the CD. It is stated that none of the UK imports and only a small proportion from GBR III countries are slaughtered and most are eventually buried on the farm. If this assumption does not hold, then the high numbers of imports from risk countries, coupled with the unstable system could lead to a higher


GBR categorization.


Expected development of the GBR


If the stability of the system in Brazil remains as low as it is, significant external challenges could lead to an increase in the GBR of the country.


A table summarising the reasons for the current assessment is given in the table below.




SNIP...SEE FULL TEXT ;









Date: 8/31/2005


GAIN Report Number: BR5622


B


Brazil


Livestock and Products


Annual Report


2005




Approved by:


Alan Hrapsky, Agricultural Counselor


U.S. Embassy


Prepared by:


Joao F. Silva, Agricultural Specialist



The Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) of the European Union reassessed the geographical BSE risk for Brazil from GBR 1 to GBR 2 (unlikely, but a BSE risk cannot be excluded), basically due to the cattle imports from the United Kingdom during 1991-95.



www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200509/146130887.pdf









GBR II: unlikely but not excluded Botswana (I), Brazil (I), Colombia, Costa Rica (II), El Salvador (I), India, Kenya, Mauritius, Namibia (I), Nicaragua (I), Nigeria, Norway (I), Pakistan, Sweden (II), Swaziland (I)







SEE U.K. LIVE CATTLE EXPORT TO BRAZIL HERE ;






SEE U.K. BEEF AND VEAL EXPORT TO BRAZIL HERE ;






SEE U.K. SEMEN TO BRAZIL HERE ;






SEE U.K. DEAD ANIMAL PDT AND ANIMALS NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION EXPORT TO BRAZIL 1995






SEE. U.K. EMBRYOS EXPORT TO WORLD HERE ;






SEE U.K. MEAT AND BONE MEAL GREAVES EXPORTS TO THE WORLD






Fourth threat


Prion infectivity has now been detected in blood, urine and milk and this has potential consequences on risk assessments for the environment and food as well as for contamination of surfaces including medical instruments. Furthermore the procedures recommended for decontamination of MBM (Meat and Bone Meal), which are based on older methodologies not designed for this purpose, have turned out to be of very limited efficacy and compromise current policies concerning the reuse of these high value protein supplements (cross-contamination of feed circuits are difficult to control). It should be noted that the destruction or very limited use of MBM is estimated to still cost 1 billion euros per year to the European economy, whereas other countries, including the US, Brazil, and Argentine do not have these constraints.






Friday, December 07, 2012



ATYPICAL BSE BRAZIL 2010 FINALLY CONFIRMED OIE 2012





 
 
 
 
 


Síndrome de Alpers uma variante da Doença de Creutzfeldt-Jakob?



Alpers’ disease a variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease?



Henrique Pott Jr.1, Maria Cristina Furian Ferreira2, Amilcar Castro de

Mattos3




ABSTRACT



The dementia, is usually associated with other neurological abnormalities, and a definitive diagnosis of most syndromes depends on neuropathological examination. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in children presents neuropathological examination similar to Alpers’ disease, which have given attention to the differential diagnosis between these syndromes. The aim of this study was to report a case of progressive degenerative spongiform encephalopathy in infancy with study of autopsy. Keywords. Dementia, Differential Diagnosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome, Alpers Syndrome. Citation. Pott Jr. H, Ferreira MCF, Mattos AC. Alpers’ disease a variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease?





snip...



Case Description




Female patient, 5 years, with frame clinical and progressive encephalopathy in our hospital since 6 months of age. As showed inrespiratory sufficiency, was kept breathing assist from since that date. Clinical data of early admission exclude the possibility of secondary ischemic to trauma during dleivery. The worsening progressive neurological reflexes, including deep, led to succesive clinical and laboratory investigations pouco enlightening.




snip, see full text ;













Creutzfeldt Jakob disease

 
 

The agenda than revenge




By Nathália Kneipp Sena on 14/08/2012 in issue 707





Every time the national press exposes the possible existence of the disease in Brazil popularly known as "mad cow disease", the news dies on the beach. This happens because there is insufficient evidence to sensationalism desired (and lasting) or potential for a diplomatic crisis - ruin the fortunes of kings livestock and widespread burning of politicians and bureaucrats - or for the sacrifice of entire herds, as happened across the Sea, UK.

 
 

The ordeal of the victims and those affected by prion disease and their families, which already occurs in the country for decades, and is considered minor misfortune taboo subject, plot that disenchanted opposite its theoretical complexity and escalating scientific terms that surround the "discovery" and the manifestations of the "prion" - pathogenic protein acquired by inheritance or contagion - a silent serial killer who for centuries decimated several species of animals worldwide, including humans.

 
 

The supposed rarity of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans manifestation of a pathogenic protein, which is also identified in bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE (bovine acronym of the English expression spongiform encephalopathy), or "mad cow disease , "comes to be stated on the website of the Ministry of Health as nonexistent (no record) in Brazil since 1994.

 
 
 

Victims of CJD in Brazil



Read more at: https://bitly.com/SWfcKb




***

 
 

[Nathália Kneipp Sena is a journalist, Brasília, DF]


 
 




 
 



Thursday, February 14, 2013


The Many Faces of Mad Cow Disease Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE and TSE prion disease

 





Tuesday, March 05, 2013


A closer look at prion strains Characterization and important implications Prion


7:2, 99–108; March/April 2013; © 2013 Landes Bioscience

 






Sunday, March 31, 2013


Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease CJD worlds youngest documented victim, 11 years old, shall we pray













 
 
 


TSS

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home